02
SOURCE RECORDKorean source
JP ORGANIZATION · CONSTITUTIONAL CANON
Not a document that expands authority,
but a standard that stops those who hold it.
The proposed JP Constitution is the highest internal standard intended to require everyone acting in the name or under the authority of JP Organization—including the founder—to stop before the person, the facts, the record, and due process.
MASTER v5.0 · JP-CONST-ANNALS-2026-0728 · 72 articles, institutional gazettes, system journals, required registers, and ratification annexes · 116 pages
01 / CURRENT LEGAL STATUS
INTEGRATED DRAFT FOR RATIFICATION
It is the highest internal canonical text,
but it is not yet a constitution in force.
It does not replace a national constitution, an entity's governing documents, an operating agreement, an engagement document, or applicable law. It may become an effective text only after all six records below exist and each entity to which it applies has lawfully adopted it.
Oratorium register
Valid Oratorium constitution register
Two-thirds record
Record of consent by two thirds of all members
Written ratification
Written ratification by Founder & President Pietro Jun
Decision Register
Entry of the ratification decision in the Decision Register
Final institutional record
Final decision record of the Silence Chamber
Effective copy
Confirmed effective date and controlled-copy number
02 / FIVE ROOTS
PERSON · FACT · DUTY · MEMORY · REOPENING
Every article returns
to five roots.
Speed, performance, the founder's wishes, or a system's output cannot erase these five standards.
Person
Players, parents, employees, clients, people who have suffered harm, and collaborators are not treated merely as inputs for revenue, contracts, or performance. Dignity, consent, safety, recovery, and vulnerability are considered first.
Fact
Directly verified facts are separated from other people's statements, circumstances, human inference, model inference, emotion, legal assessment, and what remains unverified.
Responsibility
The authority holder, operator, reviewer, approver, and records custodian are separated. An operator cannot give final approval to their own work.
Memory
Where a legal preservation duty or Legal Hold applies, originals and correction histories are preserved. Other records are subject to purpose-specific retention periods, access controls, and lawful deletion or anonymisation.
Reopening
Internal review reopens when new evidence, new harm, a change of jurisdiction, a false premise, or a conflict of interest is identified. This process does not automatically alter a final judgment, limitation period, valid settlement, or court-ordered closure.
03 / CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONS
SEPARATE REVIEW · RECORDED AUTHORITY
Before naming an institution,
record the question and authority.
The functions below form the public structure of the ratification draft. They are not described as operating bodies or committees until their membership, authority, effective date, and responsible person are registered.
Silence Chamber
Proposed final internal review line under the ratification draftA proposed internal review line that, after ratification, would approve, narrow, hold, return, or reject a review proposal and set a new review date.
It does not replace any entity's statutory bodies, accounting, general intake, legal engagement, the independence of the responsible lawyer, judicial decisions, or day-to-day management.
Oratorium
Deliberation · CoordinationIt translates institutional direction and facts from the field, and records failure, uncertainty, dissent, and hidden burdens.
It is not described as a constituted body until a valid membership register and genuinely different people and perspectives are in place.
Founder & President
Direction · RatificationIt holds final direction and ratification but cannot override originals, evidence, applicable law, valid contracts, or rules that preserve dissent.
Founder status alone creates neither unregistered authority nor power to bind another entity.
Lincoln / Lincoln AI
Consistent standards · Internal controlIt checks whether the same standards are applied to the same risks and whether exceptions are justified, with consent, proportionality, remedy, and human approval.
It is not a government regulator, lawyer, or autonomous decision-maker, and it cannot authorise legal acts or external execution.
Henry
Human-impact reviewIt records human dignity, care, vulnerability, the possibility of recovery, coercion, and secondary harm as separate review factors.
It does not replace medical or psychological diagnosis or professional counselling.
04 / THREE LEGAL FUNCTIONS
Juris organises meaning,
JPLaw designs boundaries, and Legal supports execution.
The three functions do not replace one another, and none of their names creates legal authority without qualification, jurisdiction, and a mandate.
JP Org Juris
Meaning · Classification · Jurisdiction · Rights structureIt maps potentially applicable law, authority, consent, evidence, and forms of remedy. It does not replace a legal opinion from a qualified lawyer.
JPLaw
Internal constitutional and compliance boundariesIt designs internal standards for permission, prohibition, and stopping during formation. It does not currently provide legal determinations, legal services, or matter engagement.
JP Sports Group Legal
Sports · Entity executionThis is a separate internal function supporting the preparation and operation of contracts, notices, evidence lists, response documents, and standard procedures within a scope where authorised personnel and any necessary external advice have been confirmed.
05 / REQUIRED REGISTERS
NO REGISTER · NO INTERNAL AUTHORISATION
Not a declaration,
but a system of living registers.
“No Register, No Internal Authorization.” This means that authority and decisions without a register are not recognised as internally authorised by JP; applicable law determines external legal effect and the rights of third parties.
Authority Register
Records who may sign, approve, pay, or publish what
Decision Register
Records the decision-maker, reasons, dissent, approval scope, and next review date
Evidence Ledger
Records the original's location, custodian, source, creation time, and preservation state
Promise Ledger
Records who made a promise, its content and conditions, the counterparty, and expiry date
Contract Registry
Records the parties, entity, version, signatures, amount, term, and governing law
Legal Hold & Chain of Custody
Records deletion prohibitions and the history of evidence movement and access
Claim Spine
Separates facts, reports, inferences, opinions, legal assessments, and unverified matters sentence by sentence
Unknown Passport
Records what is not yet known, the material required, the person responsible, and the next review date
Human Impact Memo
Records how a decision may affect life, bodily integrity, conscience, safety, and recovery
Clean Hands Ledger
Records facts adverse to JP and ordinary alternative explanations
Errata & Reopening Register
Records the original error, reason for correction, affected scope, and decision to reopen
06 / AUTHORITY & IMMUTABLE CORE
RECORDED INTERNAL AUTHORITY · NO DELETION OF DIGNITY
Confirm JP internal authority through records,
and never abolish the core principles.
- A conversation does not constitute approval.
- Receiving material does not constitute consent or engagement.
- Attending a meeting does not create representative authority.
- Knowing the JP name does not grant permission to use its marks or materials, or internal access to its network of relationships.
- A personal relationship with the founder does not confer power to bind the organisation or any related entity.
- Written authority in the Authority Register may itself be insufficient; the actual entity, jurisdiction, qualifications, valid contract, and rules protecting third parties must also be confirmed.
Human dignity · Freedom from coercion and freely given consent · Evidence first and preservation of originals · Written authority and named human responsibility · Preservation of adverse facts and dissent · Preservation of correction history where lawful and no retroactive falsification · Correction, remedy, and formal reopening upon new evidence
07 / APPLICABLE LAW PRIORITY
INTERNAL FLOOR · NEVER A SUBSTITUTE FOR LAW
A ratified JP Constitution is an internal minimum standard.
It does not replace applicable law.
Where a conflict may exist, external action stops while the exact entity, jurisdiction, qualified person, and documents are confirmed. Findings and reasons for change are entered in the Decision Register. The Master Canon does not automatically bind every related entity; each entity must adopt in writing its scope of application, jurisdiction, responsible person, effective date, conflict rules, and controlled-copy number.
Mandatory law
ORDER OF CONTROLMandatory law of the relevant jurisdiction, court and regulatory orders, and applicable professional rules
A lower-level instruction is not applied where it conflicts with a higher-order rule.
Entity instruments
ORDER OF CONTROLEach entity's governing documents, operating agreements, member resolutions, and valid contracts or engagement documents
A lower-level instruction is not applied where it conflicts with a higher-order rule.
Ratified JP Constitution
ORDER OF CONTROLThe JP Constitution, adopted through lawful procedure and registered as applicable to the entity
A lower-level instruction is not applied where it conflicts with a higher-order rule.
Policies & instructions
ORDER OF CONTROLPolicies, standard procedures, individual instructions, and internal system outputs beneath the Constitution
A lower-level instruction is not applied where it conflicts with a higher-order rule.
08 / PUBLIC REFERENCE FRAME
OFFICIAL SOURCES · JURISDICTION STILL REQUIRED
Use international principles as references,
and confirm actual duties for each jurisdiction.
The materials below are reference standards used to review the structure of the public draft. They are not presented as laws that apply uniformly to every JP entity and activity.
G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023
An international reference standard for separation of roles, independent judgment, conflicts of interest, internal control, reporting, and lines of responsibility
Official sourceUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
A reference standard for identifying, preventing, and mitigating risks to people, ongoing due diligence, and access to remedy
Official sourceEU General Data Protection Regulation
Where the EU scope applies, legal standards for purpose limitation, minimisation, accountability, protection by design, and records of processing
Official sourceNIST IR 8387
Public technical guidance on the integrity and availability of digital evidence, metadata, and transfer history; it is not law
Official sourceNIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
A voluntary framework for governing, mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks, including human roles, oversight, and documentation
Official sourceU.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure · Rule 37(e)
A jurisdiction-specific reference on failures to preserve electronically stored information in U.S. federal litigation; it is not a universal duty
Official source09 / PRESENT STATUS
Structure exists to protect.
It claims no authority before ratification.
Master v5.0 is an integrated enactment draft for ratification. It is not described as an ENACTED CONSTITUTION or RATIFIED CANON until all six ratification records and lawful adoption by each entity have been confirmed.