Controlled English originalLanguage editions

CURRENT GUIDANCE · RES PUBLICA · INSTITUTIONAL ENQUIRIES OPEN

Raw prudence.

Law should tell people where they stand. This address is a door, not a maze.

The more complex a matter, the simpler and more accurate its first record must be. We separate facts, claims, documents, dates, authority, jurisdiction, and questions so the next step can begin with the right professional and a defined scope. This is not a warning that blocks the brand's front door, but a professional connection route that works when needed.

Current statusACTIVEInstitutional enquiry · Existing-project correspondence · No legal intake

01 / WHAT WE CAN RECEIVE

Turn the brand's philosophy
into deliverables people can buy and understand.

Five deliverables create the first route. Each is a document that makes the next step precise, not a conclusion.

01
Issue Map

The issue on one page

Separates facts, claims, open questions, parties, jurisdictions, and deadlines.

02
Chronology & Evidence

Time and evidence

Organises originals, sources, changes, gaps, and preservation measures.

03
Authority & Conflict

Who can do what

Maps the parties, entities, mandates, conflicts of interest, and questions of professional qualification.

04
Counsel Handoff

Ready for a professional to read

Packages the question list, key materials, requested outcome, and scope for handoff to an external professional.

05
Institutional Response

Prepare public and institutional responses

Prepares verified facts, the authorised spokesperson, preservation records, and a draft response.

02 / THE HUMAN ROUTE

From the first question
to the next choice.

Each stage is a bridge explaining why the next step is needed, not a gate that traps the client at the previous one.

  1. 01Check safety and deadlines
  2. 02Receive minimum facts
  3. 03Separate evidence, authority, and jurisdiction
  4. 04Define professional questions and scope
  5. 05Written scope · External professional engagement or internal decision
  6. 06Record · Handoff · Closure

Arrival does not create an engagementThe actual contracting entity · scope · cost · professional qualifications · jurisdiction · data processing are confirmed in the written documents for that specific work.This sentence is not a wall that erases client value; it is the foundation for an accurate next step.

03 / HOW AN ENQUIRY MOVES

Res Publica receives it,
and the record preserves the decision.

An external enquiry does not automatically become a matter file or legal engagement. Only defined institutional questions and requests for non-legal deliverables enter the recorded internal route.

  1. 1External individual or organisation — sends a non-sensitive enquiry summary and desired outcome to the institutional address
  2. 2Korea routing desk — makes one routing decision in Korea, regardless of where the enquiry arrived. It separates fact, claim, and unknown, then identifies which qualified route should decide
  3. 3JPLAW RES PUBLICA — reviews whether to route the enquiry as existing-project correspondence, a non-legal deliverable, or an enquiry to an external professional
  4. 4ANon-legal deliverable — after scope and cost are confirmed in a separate document, prepares an Issue Map, chronology, authority and conflict map, and professional handoff material
  5. 4BInstitutional question — only the defined question enters the record and research route; where legal judgment is required, a qualified external lawyer is engaged separately
  6. 5Internal decision record — records facts, law, authority, options, risks, dissent, the responsible person, and a proposed decision line
  7. 6Final judgment — records approval, narrowing, return, hold, or no position
  8. 7Recorded instruction — the responsible function executes within the approved authority and limits

04 / LEGAL STRUCTURE

Separated powers,
one trinity.

JP Juris establishes meaning, JPLaw fixes the permitted boundary, and JP Sports Group Legal carries it into practice. They must remain separate to resist corruption, yet move together to protect people.

I
JP Juris · Institute of Jurisprudence

Establish meaning

Breaks down what is fact, authority, consent, and harm: jurisdiction, rights, duties, remedies, and institutional meaning.

II
JPLaw · Raw Prudence

Fix the permitted boundary

Permission gates for contract, consent, confidentiality, personal data, authority, and responsibility: NDAs, consent forms, non-circumvention, and authority matrices.

III
JP Sports Group Legal

Carry it into practice

Players, agents, clubs, associations, FIFA, transfers, and registration: law as actually performed.

IV
Crisis Legal · Outside the trinity

Stop first in a crisis

A sealed legal route for crises, high-risk matters, and multi-jurisdiction cases: criminal, civil, evidence preservation, and international cooperation. Emergency authority must expire and must not become permanent rule.

V
External professionals

Qualifications come from outside

JP's internal structure does not create a lawyer's qualification or authority for external legal representation. Legal opinions, litigation, and formal representation are routed to qualified professionals in each jurisdiction.

  1. 01A compliance document without jurisprudence becomes a list of clauses
  2. 02Execution without a compliance gate becomes field sales
  3. 03Jurisprudence without execution becomes a philosophy paper
  4. 04The three powers without an observation room become authority without a ledger
  5. 05The three powers without a crisis stop cannot halt in a crisis

05 / LANGUAGE · TRANSLATION · PUBLIC-EXPRESSION REVIEW

In an international matter,
translation changes evidence.

That is why the person who produces a translation cannot approve it alone. One representative risk we guard against is a translation turning a threat into a joke.

01
The review question

Understanding, not grammar

The question is not merely, “Is it grammatically correct?” It is: within their language and culture, what promise, threat, right, or responsibility will the actual party understand this to mean?

02
Separate execution from approval

The hand that made it does not pass it

The team that performs the translation is separate from the review that approves its integrity of meaning.

03
Cross-review

Let them test one another deliberately

Language review and contract review are deliberately placed on opposing sides so that legal intuition and legal logic are assessed separately.

04
Minimum deliverable

No judgment goes unrecorded

At least one record remains: a memorandum, register, review result, hold decision, or routing record. An unrecorded judgment does not exist institutionally.

05
How a public statement is released

Four stages

Language review + verification of facts and authority → legal review → public-standard review → register update.

Internal nameThe internal name of this review system is Hikari(light). Externally, it is named by function: the language, translation, and public-expression review system.Responsibility and deliverables must come before the aesthetics of a name.

06 / LEGAL WORK · LAWYER-SUPERVISED DESIGN

International problems break open in the space between.
We design that space.

Sense & Sensibility Work Studioworks with JPLaw to design a working method for international matters. The studio does not make one side disappear for the sake of smoothness; it creates new work in the space where two languages and two systems meet. That space is precisely where cross-border matters break down.

01
What is made

International problem-solving design brief

A working design brief that sets the order of questions, what must be checked first, and where work must stop. It fixes the questions and sequence in advance so that a person need not explain everything from the beginning each time.

02
How it is made

Under a lawyer's supervision

The studio does not create the design brief alone. It is prepared under the supervision of a qualified lawyer and reviewed before use. A design brief prepared without that supervision is not released externally.

03
The studio's method

Five acts of making

Sense — read the signals already present. And — the hinge connecting two truths. Sensibility — feeling and consequence. Work — the act of making something real. Studio — the place where it is made. The long name is the method.

04
The risk of translation that erases the space between

Smoothness changes evidence

The moment language is polished to fit one culture, a threat can become a joke and conditional consent can become a firm promise. A design brief may be used only after it has also passed language and translation review.

05
BOUNDARY · NOT LEGAL ADVICE

A design brief is not legal advice

A working design brief is a tool for organising a matter, not a legal opinion. A lawyer's supervision means review; it does not create representation or engagement. Actual rights and duties arise only through a written engagement in the relevant jurisdiction.

Why a studio does legal workIn an international matter, people are usually failed not by the text of a law but by a question placed incorrectly between two systems. Placing that question is an act of making, and therefore belongs to the studio.Judgment, however, belongs to a qualified person—the making hand and the judging hand remain separate here as well.

07 / INDEPENDENT LEGAL JUDGMENT

Not a campaign organisation,
but a research institution.

Research · Public interest · Institutional relations—connecting evidence, law, human impact, and feasibility.

01
Research

Education · Law · International relations

Public-interest research and policy proposals, including research on sport for people with disabilities and vulnerable groups.

02
Forum

Independent Legal Judgment Forum

Cross-border law is discussed only while remaining free from capture by any political faction, sponsor, or institution.

03
Relations

Universities · Research institutes · Embassies

Institutional relations, professional advisory networks, and an international cooperation desk.

04
Output

Public-interest report

Written only from verified facts and evidence, with what remains unverified marked as such.

05
Gate

Six stages before publication

Preserve the unverified → verify facts and authority → test legitimacy → protect people → review language → verify publication.

08 / JUDGMENT AND STOPPING

Departments execute,
review chambers stop.

The place that executes is separated from the place that can stop. Each review chamber is responsible for one question to the end; if that question has no answer, the work does not pass.

01
Final judgment

Does this belong in our future?

Approve · Narrow · Return · Hold. Not every matter reaches this point. It handles only the institution's final line.

02
Preserve dissent

What are the real options and opposing views?

Dissent is not rewritten as an elegant statement of consensus. If it is missing, the work is returned.

03
Legitimacy review

Can it withstand public audit?

Consistency · Proportionality · No self-exemption. A decision that violates principle is stopped.

04
Verify facts and authority

What has been verified from an original?

Unverified claims, unauthorised payments, and unauthorised publication are placed on hold.

05
Verify actual existence

Where does it actually exist?

Entity · Account · Address · Equipment · System. A plan must not be presented as a present fact.

06
Blind spot

What hidden harm and secondary effects exist?

It looks for harm caused by good intentions and requires redesign where necessary.

07
Human impact

Who is harmed or exhausted?

It examines workload and deployment. Even profitable work can stop when a person is at stake.

08
Protect recovery

Can the person continue without breaking down?

Recovery · Rest · Protection of vulnerable people. This is not a hospital or diagnostic service.

09
Language · Meaning

How will the other party understand it in their own language?

Approval of translation, naming, and public expression. This is the review system described in item 04 above.

10
Cohesion

How do relationships and belonging change?

Cultural integration and early warning of fraud. It may revise the public tone.

11
Crisis stop

What must be preserved and stopped first?

A time-limited emergency stop. It cannot become permanent power.

12
Post-crisis repair

What remains after the crisis?

Remove fear, retaliation, and contamination, then set conditions for re-entry.

Eight gates that must be passed

  1. 01Reason to exist — Why should this exist?
  2. 02Novelty — Is it new, necessary, and reversible? · No self-approval by the team that created it
  3. 03Repeatability — Can it be delivered consistently? · Law, people, and evidence must not be erased in the name of efficiency
  4. 04Quantitative review — What are the total cost, loss, probability, and reserve? · No unsupported valuation
  5. 05Legal gate — Jurisdiction, authority, duty, remedy, and licensing route · No unqualified legal representation
  6. 06Public verification — What can responsibly be shown externally?
  7. 07Protect trust — Does help or access turn into ownership or control?
  8. 08Form review — Does the form preserve truth, dignity, and context? · Aesthetics must not replace evidence

About internal namesEach review chamber has an internal name. On the public surface it is identified only by function, because responsibility and deliverables must come before the aesthetics of a name.The full internal constitution is not laid out before visitors like a menu.

09 / PEOPLE PROTECTION

Are we reducing a person
to a function?

A player becomes a product, a parent becomes a payer, and an employee becomes a shield. We check every moment when a person is turned into a function.

01
Protect recovery

Right to recovery and to stop

Recovery · Rest · Protection of vulnerable people. An operating decision may be overridden when human safety is at stake.

02
Practical support

Practical support and professional connections

Care coordination · Everyday support · External referral. Quiet, careful, and dignified—not a conspicuous concierge service.

03
Human buffer

Human buffer

So that precision does not become cold harm, and goodwill does not become bribery, favouritism, coercion, or a collapse of boundaries.

04
The chain that must be broken

How a consultation becomes a dispute

A consultation becomes a promise, the promise becomes an offer, the offer becomes a payment, the payment creates an expectation, and a broken expectation becomes a dispute.

05
Boundary

What we do not provide directly

Psychological counselling, psychotherapy, diagnosis, medical care, emergency services, or crisis response. Unlicensed clinical diagnosis is prohibited. People are connected to qualified, independent professionals.

10 / OPERATING DISCIPLINE

Six
hard rules.

If any one of these is missing, the work does not go outside.

  1. 01If it is not in the register, it does not exist
  2. 02No evidence, no promise
  3. 03No transaction without legal review
  4. 04No public statement without language review
  5. 05No external proposal without public verification
  6. 06No high-risk execution without verified facts and authority

A name without a reproducible method is not intellectual propertyAt least three verified input-and-output cases are required.The aim is not to sound poetic. It is to let an outsider understand the system within three minutes and trust the operating discipline behind it within ten.

11 / RECORDS

The founding sources are
preserved without erasure.

Eight Korean founding source records. Their language and concepts are preserved as they were, but kept separate from current guidance.

A01 Founding story

The experience of harm and the origin of the effort to prepare a more responsible institution.

Open Korean source →

A02 People protection

Early protection principles concerning safety, consent, records, and handoff.

Open Korean source →

A03 Public relationship record

A formation-era relationship map explaining support, routing, and separated authority.

Open Korean source →

A07 Internal-control concept

A review method separating evidence, adverse review, and human approval.

Open Korean source →

12 / EXTERNAL COUNSEL

Routing begins in Korea
and extends from there to the world.

Wherever a matter arrives, the routing decision is made in one place. Korea is responsible for routing. There, fact is separated from claim and the qualified route that should decide is identified before the matter is handed to a professional in the relevant jurisdiction. JP's internal structure does not create a lawyer's qualification or external representative authority. Qualifications always come from outside.

01
ROUTING LEAD · KOREA · CONFIRMED

Attorney Kim Youngmyung · law firm not publicly identified

KOREA-NODE LEGAL AND COMPLIANCE ROUTING REVIEW · RIGHTS AND JURISDICTION. Reviews routing rules and review standards so incoming questions about contracts, rights, labour, and regulation do not go to the wrong service. Clearly separates what further facts are needed from which qualified route should decide. Maintains the necessary record so the client does not have to repeat the same explanation.

02
Why one place?

When routing fragments, the person must repeat themselves

If each jurisdiction receives the matter separately, the same person gives the same explanation three times, and each time facts and claims become mixed. Separating them in one place keeps a single continuous record and makes missing facts visible there. Korea's analytical rigour and acute judgment separate the issues first, then send them outward.

03
PEOPLE WE THANK · SPAIN

Elena Sánchez Tirado

Elena Sánchez Tirado shared helpful perspectives during the formation period. We are grateful for her advice. NO FORMAL ROLE.She is not an employee, partner, adviser, representative, or authorised referral route of J&P, Raw Prudence, or JPLAW. Her current work and affiliations are independent and are not presented here as ours.

04
PEOPLE WE THANK · SPAIN

David Diaz

David Diaz shared legal and business perspectives with the founder during an earlier formation period. We are grateful for his advice. He is not an employee, partner, adviser, representative, or authorised referral route of J&P, Raw Prudence, or JPLAW. No current affiliation, authority, engagement, or continuing formal role is claimed.

05
NOT CLAIMED

Neither affiliation nor engagement

The firms and RFEF mentioned here are not presented as J&P clients, partners, or engagements. Historical relationship records and current affiliations must be read separately.

06
Operating rule

External Counsel Management

Manages the selection, engagement, scope, cost, and transfer material for licensed lawyers in each jurisdiction. A former prosecutor specialising in criminal law leads or reviews criminal matters.

07
Publication standard

No name is published without written consent

Additional advisers and affiliations are added to this list only after the individual's written consent and current qualifications have been recorded in the register. Until then, the place remains empty.

Why record this much?A person's real name and affiliation are their assets, not our promotional material. The moment a past relationship is made to look like present authority, it becomes an unsupported claim and a burden to that person as well as to us.No evidence, no promise—the second rule of this site.

13 / INSTITUTIONAL ENQUIRIES

Receipt is not approval,
and silence is not consent.

Receipt is not approval; discussion is not authority; a proposal is not permission; and silence is not consent. Subject to those boundaries, the door is open.

Existing clients · Projects

Next steps and scope for work already under way.

Companies · Institutions

Cooperation, trade, joint work, and institutional due diligence.

Players · Creators

Start with a question when you do not know which door to use.

External lawyers · Professionals

Handoff of a Counsel Handoff packet.

Media · Public authorities

Verification and correction of public records.

INSTITUTIONAL CORRESPONDENCE · jp@rawprudence.org

PUBLIC TRUST REGISTER · 17 AUGUST 2026

We disclose relationships and addresses,
but publish only what is verified.

Digital addresses were rechecked against current DNS and public web responses. For regional locations, we publish the city and the character of the JP source record; a street address is not presented as a public office until current use, visitor access and safety are reverified.

Family relationship and legal-routing disclosure

Raw Prudence/JPLAW is being formed within the family-owned and family-operated JP network. Founder Pietro Jun and Attorney Kim Youngmyung are family. That trust supports Korea-first routing, and the relationship is disclosed rather than hidden. It does not by itself create a retainer, representative authority or a lawyer-client relationship.

Attorney Kim Youngmyung is named for the Korea routing role. His law firm and any global sports or cross-border legal-partner candidate without completed written public-use consent remain anonymous and are described only as under discussion. Legal work proceeds separately only after jurisdiction, qualification, conflicts and written authority are verified.

Verified digital addresses

Regional address register

Confirm before visiting. Regional entries below are not claims of a registered office or a permanent walk-in desk. A precise visit address is shared directly only after entity, use right, appointment and safety are reverified.

SOURCE · jpsportsgroup.com · public location record
01Korea
JP Org. Yongin Office · Korea LLC7th Floor, Unit 703-J189, 9 Gangnamseo-ro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea 16977
JP Organization source correspondence reference
02North America
JPSPG Fayetteville Office · US LLC5135 Morganton Road, Suite 103, Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States 28314
JPSPG Utah Office · US LLC2343E Kensington Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States 84108
Georgia Office · former US East Coast LLC base2024 Beech St., Savannah, Georgia, United States 31404
JP Sports Group source office references · appointment required
03Europe
JP Madrid Seasonal OfficeMadrid Hot Desk Shared Offices · seasonal / temporary public source record
Warsaw Office · Sp. z o.o.CIC Warsaw, Chmielna 73, Warszawa, Mazowieckie, Poland 00-801
Transition and planning references · current office not asserted
04Oceania
JP Sydney Office · Pty Ltd · former Oceania HQ77 Versace Crescent, Melonba, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2765
JP Sports Group source office reference · current use to be reverified
05South America
JP Buenos Aires Satellite Office · ArgentinaMedrano 1600, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina C1425
JP Montevideo Field Office · non-lucrative scouting recordRío Arapey 223, Barros Blancos, Canelones, Uruguay 15500
Satellite and field references · no walk-in service asserted